After Ayodhya and Lord Ram, Oli's new claim - Yoga was born in Nepal, then India did not even exist

After Ayodhya and Lord Ram, Oli's new claim - Yoga was born in Nepal, then India did not even exist

Nepal's Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli had earlier claimed that the real Ayodhya is in Nepal. Now he has said that Yoga was born in Nepal. He says that yoga was discovered even before India came into existence. Oli made this statement while addressing a program on International Yoga Day.

However, this is not his first claim to claim Indian heritage as his own. Earlier, he has told India's Ayodhya as fake and said that the real Ayodhya is near Birganj. On the occasion of International Yoga Day, Oli said that yoga was first started in Nepal.

Said - Indian experts hiding the facts

Oli said that at the time of the beginning of yoga, India was not made but it was scattered in many pieces. He said that Indian experts are hiding facts related to this. Oli, on the other hand, is facing criticism in Nepal. He is accused of creating controversy with India to hide the shortcomings of his government.

Claimed on Lord Rama

Last year, PM Oli had staked his claim on Lord Ram and Ayodhya. Oli had said that Ayodhya is in Nepal and India has committed cultural encroachment by creating a fake Ayodhya. Prime Minister Oli made this statement at a program organized on the birth anniversary of poet Bhanubhakta Acharya. He had said that Nepal has been culturally oppressed. At the same time, he said that the historical facts related to Nepal have also been tampered with.

Oli said that we still believe that we gave Sita to the Indian prince Ram, but we had married Sita to the prince of Ayodhya located in Nepal, not to the prince of Ayodhya of India. The Nepalese Prime Minister argued on his claim that if India's Ayodhya was real, then why would the princes of that place come so far to Janakpuri to get married?

Shopping in supermarket became the cause of death! Exit gate closed after massive fire, 396 people were burnt to death

Shopping in supermarket became the cause of death! Exit gate closed after massive fire, 396 people were burnt to death

Supermarkets exist for shopping in countries around the world, where people reach to buy their everyday things. These supermarkets are equipped with all kinds of facilities to make them safe for the people. But what if someone goes to the supermarket for shopping, but does not come back alive. Actually, one such incident came to light in Paraguay on this day, when a huge fire broke out in a supermarket located in Asunción, the capital of the country. 396 people died in this incident.

On August 1, 2004, a massive fire broke out at the Ycuá Bolaños supermarket in Asuncion. The thing to note here is that in case of fire, the exit gate is usually opened, so that people can get out safely. But after the fire in this supermarket, the exit gate itself was closed. The reason behind this was to prevent people from stealing goods. On the other hand, while supermarkets around the world are safe, this building lacked adequate fire protection systems. The president of the supermarket company as well as various employees were later sentenced to prison for their actions during the fire.

How did the fire in the supermarket?

On August 1, 2004, there were two explosions on the first floor, after which a fire broke out. This fire kept burning for seven hours, after hard work, the fire department brought the fire under control. After the incident, it was found that 396 people have died due to burns. In addition, more than 500 people have been injured. The cause of the fire was told that there was a bad barbecue chimney, which leaked hot flammable gases into the roof. Because of this the fire started.

More attention was given to supermarket goods than life

Fire survivors and volunteer firefighters alleged that during the time the fire broke out, the doors inside the complex were locked at the instructions of supermarket owners Juan Pio Paiva and his son Victor Daniel. Because of this people got trapped inside the blazing complex. This was done so that people could not run away with the goods without paying. However, the management of the supermarket vehemently denied these allegations. At the same time, Paiva, his son and the security guard surrendered before the police and charges were framed against them.