Owaisi hopes that the Asi Report on Gyanvapi would prevent the “Thousand Babris” from flooding in

Asaduddin Owaisi, the head of AIMIM, pondered the future on Saturday and hoped that the floodgates for a “thousand Babris” (Babri Masjids) would not be opened if the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) findings on the Gyanvapi mosque problem are made public following the investigation.

Despite claims by the Muslim side that the exercise will “reopen wounds of the past,” the Supreme Court on Friday declined to stay the Allahabad High Court order allowing the ASI to conduct a scientific survey at the Gyanvapi mosque complex to ascertain if the 17th century structure was built upon an earlier temple.

In a tweet, the AIMIM leader stated his hope that neither the occurrences of “December 23 nor December 6” will happen again and that the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Ayodhya case, which upheld the sanctity of the Places of Worship Act, would be upheld.

 

Who knows how things will turn out after the public release of the #Gyanvapi ASI reports. One hopes that neither the 23rd nor the 6th of December will occur again. The sacredness of the Places of Worship Act must be respected, as stated by the Supreme Court in the Ayodhya decision. The hope is that the floodgates won’t be opened for a thousand Babris, Owaisi tweeted.

 

Owaisi expressed concern to reporters at this location that the BJP-RSS would create a narrative after the release of the ASI findings.

 

Yogi Adityanath, the chief minister of Uttar Pradesh, had already released a statement and was establishing a narrative before the Allahabad High Court’s ruling, the AIMIM leader said.

 

“As ASI’s report is released, a narrative will be established throughout the nation. Following that, we fear that December 23 should not occur and December 6 should not occur, both of which I hope won’t happen. That is what we fear. We do not want so many Babri Masjid-related concerns to surface, the guy remarked.

 

The Hyderabad MP responded to a question by stating that he had previously talked in Parliament on the need of creating a de-radicalization cell for each group inside the Union Home Ministry.

 

Regarding the most recent train shooting event, he said that the accused was cognizant and “expressing his hate” rather than being mentally ill.

 

“These people were radicalized,” he continued.

 

He questioned if exclusively Muslim homes will be destroyed in reference to the recent riots in Haryana, which resulted in the destruction of illegal dwellings.

 

Will you destroy the residences of those who murdered the Imam of the Mosque? Will you destroy the home of individuals who attempted to set fire to a Mosque? You won’t destroy. Only Muslim homes will be demolished.

 

Bulldozer justice eliminates the necessity for courts, the IPC, and other institutions, he said.

 

Owaisi questioned what the state government had done about the violence, pointing to an intelligence officer who had apparently alerted the administration about it.

 

Regarding the Telangana BRS government’s announcement of a job and other incentives for the family of the Hyderabad resident recently killed by an RPF policeman on a train, he suggested the governments of Bihar and Rajasthan should also take similar actions.

 

You are the ‘choudhary’ of secularism. You operate a business selling certificates stating that the person is “A Team,” secular, and of the community. Nitish Kumar and Ashok Gehlot need to follow suit, he argued, if Telangana can.

 

He expressed his gratitude to Telangana CM K Chandrasekhar Rao for intervening on behalf of AIMIM to assist the widow of the resident of Hyderabad.

 

He said, “Terrorists came from Pakistan and killed three of our soldiers and you will play world cup match in Ahmedabad,” on the fourth anniversary of Article 370’s repeal.

 

The BJP is jubilant with the repeal of Article 370, but media reports mention terrorist attacks. He said that on Friday, three troops were slain in Jammu and Kashmir.

 

Owaisi said that the violence in Manipur wouldn’t stop until the state’s chief minister was dismissed.

 

He said that regardless of whether the Prime Minister was there or not, he had supported a discussion on the Manipur issue in the Lok Sabha.