Delay in disaster help

A state that is battling to get disaster relief money from the Center while dealing with the fallout from natural disasters highlights more general concerns about accountability and governance. The Supreme Court’s involvement in response to appeals from Tamil Nadu and Karnataka highlights the critical requirement for speed and transparency when allocating money intended for disaster management.

The two states’ complaints, which call for more funding from the National Disaster Relief Fund (NDRF), are indicative of a structural issue. The Disaster Management Act, 2005, which requires prompt and sufficient aid during disasters, is cited by both states. Nevertheless, it seems that there are administrative roadblocks in the way of obtaining NDRF funding. Both states claim that the Center has been noticeably slow to provide cash, despite necessary examinations and recommendations.

It seriously jeopardizes state governments’ capacity to provide aid to the poor and erodes the spirit of cooperative federalism. Following Cyclone Michaung and the ensuing floods, Tamil Nadu has made a petition that emphasizes the urgent need for quick assistance efforts to lessen the suffering of the afflicted people. Similarly, the need of immediate assistance and the precariousness of agricultural livelihoods are summed up in Karnataka’s plea, which was spurred by extreme drought circumstances in September of last year.

The legal dispute is a reflection of the rift that exists between the Opposition-ruled states, like Punjab, and the Center. The tense ties are highlighted by Kerala’s recent appeal challenging the limitation of the state’s borrowing powers and the disagreements over the governor’s consent to bills. Millions of residents’ lives and means of subsistence are at risk. Politicians and bureaucrats should not allow the NDRF, which is considered a lifesaver in times of need, to transfer cash more slowly than necessary.