“Never Give Up”: Elite Attorneys “Grand Success Day” is how Hari Shankar Jain and Vishnu refer to Pran Pratishtha
In an interview with News18 on Pran Pratishtha ceremony, renowned attorneys Hari Shankar Jain and his son Vishnu Shankar Jain, who represented the nation in the Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi case in Ayodhya, the Gyanvapi case in Varanasi, the Taj Mahal in Agra, and the Qutub Minar in Delhi, described it as a “grand success day” for the entire nation.
We are able to witness such a momentous day after a protracted legal struggle. Today is a huge day of victory for the whole nation. Never give up hope—Kabhi Himmat Nahi Haarni Chahiye, Hari Shankar Jain said News18.
“It is a second Diwali for us,” his son Vishnu told News18, after a lavish Pran Pratishtha in Ayodhya to install the Ram Lalla statue following a centuries-old temple campaign.
The Hindu side was represented in the 1993 Babri Masjid dispute by Hari Shankar Jain. He prevailed in the Allahabad High Court case. At that moment, he was receiving help from his son, Vishnu.
Beginning in 1993, the Ayodhya controversy came to a conclusion in 2019 with the Supreme Court’s decision. By then, Vishnu was involved in the Ayodhya Ram Janmabhoomi issue.
In addition to running against prominent Congresswoman Sonia Gandhi from Amethi, Hari Shankar also sued Gandhi in court on the grounds that she is not an Indian citizen.
Speaking on behalf of the “Hindu Front for Justice” is Vishnu. In 2011, he began practicing Ram Janmabhoomi cases, contesting the Allahabad High Court’s 2010 ruling. He passed the Supreme Court’s advocate on record test in 2016 and made his first appearance there.
The well-known father-son team has already taken on over 100 cases together.
The two are also battling over the 27 Hindu and Jain temples that the Muslim conquerors demolished in order to construct Qutub Minar. at addition, challenges have been launched about the purported Shiv Mandir at Taj Mahal, contesting the Waqf Act of 1995 and its 2013 revisions, the Places of Worship Act of 1991, and the provisions enacted by different governments based on the Sachar committee findings.
