Hearing of Swami Avimukteshwaranand case in Supreme Court today, all eyes are on the verdict

The process of hearing in the Gyanvapi dispute in Varanasi is going on continuously. In the matter, a hearing is to be held in the Supreme Court today on the petition filed by Shankaracharya Avimukteshwaranand. However, this matter is separate from the main controversy. In this, he has sought permission to perform Ragabhog Aarti, worship of the figure of Shivling found on Gyanvapi premises.

Hearing today on the demand for the worship of Shivling

In fact, the matter of permission to worship the idol of Shivling found in Gyanvapi premises and perform Ragabhog Aarti was to be heard on November 18, but due to the next date being fixed for the hearing, the hearing is to be held in the court on November 23.

The district judge dismissed the petition

Let me tell you, the court had rejected the petition for the worship of Shivling found during the survey in Gyanvapi. Before dismissing the petition, the District Judge said that it appears from your application that you came to know only on May 16 that Shivling was found in Gyanvapi. So what were you doing for so long...?

Plaintiff's advocate Ramesh Upadhyay said this

In this regard, the plaintiff's advocate Ramesh Upadhyay told that, in this suit filed on behalf of Avimukteshwaranand, permission has been sought to worship the figure of Shivling found in the Gyanvapi premises and perform Ragabhog Aarti. In the matter, a hearing is to be held in the Supreme Court today on the petition filed by Shankaracharya Avimukteshwaranand.

Hearing to be held on the demand of ragbhog, worship, and aarti

Avimukteshwaranand was a disciple of Shankaracharya Swami Swaroopanand Saraswati. After his death, took over the post of Shankaracharya and filed a case in the court, in which it was demanded that the idol of the so-called Shivling found in the Shringar Gauri dispute should have been properly performed by the district administration, worship, and aarti, but the administration did not do so. not done. He told that the status of a deity in law is similar to that of a living child. To whom not giving food-water etc. is a violation of the fundamental right to personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution.